Guidance for the Implementation of Quantitative Best Practices in Healthcare Research

Quantitative scientists such as data scientists, biostatisticians, epidemiologists, and bioinformaticians, among others, are expected to exhibit rigor and reproducibility in their contributions to science. This includes ensuring data are fit for purpose, free from bias, measured with known uncertainty, that analyses are traceable to the data, and reporting is sufficient to reproduce the results. Here we provide information on best practices for rigor and reproducibility, including:

  1. Guidelines for reporting data-driven projects
  2. Guidance for clinical trial monitoring and oversight
  3. Support for compliant data management, sharing, and governance
  4. Templates and guidance documents for developing statistical analysis plans, data management plans, data quality plans, data sharing plans, and similar
  5. Developing and managing high quality data science resources  

Duke BERD offers consultations to develop analytic best practice implementation plans that utilize existing guidance. For more information or to submit other resources that should be included on this page, please contact berdcore@duke.edu.

*Access to publications listed below may require authentication through your academic institution to be accessed free of charge.

Data Collection and Management

Clinical Application and Impact

Reporting Guidelines

The EQUATOR Network (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) is a global initiative aimed at improving the reliability and value of health research literature by promoting transparent and accurate reporting. It provides access to a comprehensive collection of reporting guidelines for various study types, including randomized trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), systematic reviews (PRISMA), and more. 

Examples and Implementation Plans

COMING SOON….